Newsgroups: comp.lang.beta
Path: news.daimi.aau.dk!news.uni-c.dk!sunic!pipex!news.maz.net!news.ppp.de!news.Hanse.DE!lutzifer.hanse.de!wavehh.hanse.de!cracauer
From: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (Martin Cracauer)
Subject: Re: BETA and X-Windows (was: Re: LISP and X-Windows)
Message-ID: <1994Sep27.141144.20050@wavehh.hanse.de>
Organization: The Internet
References: <34pog5$lss@hpsystem1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <34t9k3$2g5@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <wpp.779380661@marie> <LYNBECH.94Sep15222903@xenon.daimi.aau.dk> <35dpmg$l5@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 94 14:11:44 GMT
Lines: 16

peter@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (Peter da Silva) writes:

>In article <LYNBECH.94Sep15222903@xenon.daimi.aau.dk>,
>Christian Lynbech <lynbech@xenon.daimi.aau.dk> wrote:
>>But of course, it counts in favour of BETA, that a high-level X
>>interface in fact exists. I am not aware that you could say the same
>>about something like scheme.

>STk provides a Tk toolkit interface to Scheme.

Not to forget elk (includes UNIX-Interfaces, X11 on Xlib-level and
Xt/Motif level) and winterp (Ok, not scheme).
-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin.Cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de, Fax. +49 40 5228536, German language accepted
 No guarantee for anything. Anyway, this posting is probably produced by one 
 of my cats stepping on the keys. No, I don't have an infinite number of cats.